Bug 230631
Summary: | Multilib conflict (upgrade path): /usr/share/man/man1/esd.1.gz | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Saikat Guha <sg266> |
Component: | esound | Assignee: | Bastien Nocera <bnocera> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dakingun |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 1:0.2.38-1.fc7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-05-08 14:11:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Saikat Guha
2007-03-01 21:32:42 UTC
Also the following files: file /etc/esd.conf from install of esound-libs-0.2.37-1.fc7 conflicts with file from package esound-0.2.36-3 file /usr/share/man/man1/esd-config.1.gz from install of esound-devel-0.2.37-1.fc7 conflicts with file from package esound-0.2.36-3 What's the output of: rpm -q --qf "%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n" esound-devel ? [root@sioux ~]# rpm -q --qf "%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n" esound-devel esound-devel-0.2.36-5.fc7.x86_64 Missing a few obsoletes I guess... Should be fixed in esound-1:0.2.38-1.fc7 I just installed Fedora 7 Test 4 and ran a yum upgrade, and I still get a conflict with this package. My FC6 install was fairly recent (a couple weeks ago), and I don't think I did anything to mangle the state of esound. What I've just tried is removing the existing esound with "rpm -e --nodeps", as 30 GNOME packages feel that they can't live without it elsewise, and force installing the new one from an RPM. yum seems to be letting me do an upgrade now, though I won't know if I broke anything until I restart GNOME, I guess :| I'll reply again if this doesn't fix me :) |