Bug 2306516
| Summary: | python-poetry-core: Add the infra-sig group as a project member | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nils Philippsen <nphilipp> |
| Component: | python-poetry-core | Assignee: | Tomáš Hrnčiar <thrnciar> |
| Status: | CLOSED COMPLETED | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | carl, mhroncok, michel, nphilipp, python-packagers-sig, sgallagh, thrnciar |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2024-08-21 20:17:12 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Nils Philippsen
2024-08-21 13:33:17 UTC
While I have no issue adding more co-maintainers to this package, I don't understand the reasoning. You can apply fixes via Pull Requests. Will you open this request for Python itself (a run-time dependency of rpmautospec, python-poetry-core is build-time only) as well? The justification is not quite right. The primary purpose is so that members of the infra-sig can request future EPEL branches, now that rpmautospec must be bootstrapped in each new major EPEL release. I suspect any actual changes to the package sources would be made via pull request. Added infra-sig as epel* collaborator. |