Bug 2307916

Summary:	rgw main: failed to load zone: (2) No such file or directory
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Casey Bodley <cbodley>
Component:	RGW-Multisite	Assignee:	Casey Bodley <cbodley>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Vidushi Mishra <vimishra>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	8.0	CC:	akraj, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, mbenjamin, tserlin, vimishra
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	8.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ceph-19.1.1-10.el9cp	Doc Type:	No Doc Update
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-11-25 09:07:11 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2317218

Description Casey Bodley 2024-08-26 14:54:59 UTC

Description of problem:

after upgrade to RHCS 8, radosgw may fail to start with "failed to load zone: (2) No such file or directory" errors

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

regression in RHCS 8

How reproducible:

effects "default" zone/zonegroup deployments that don't have a realm

Steps to Reproduce:
1. deploy radosgw in a non-multisite configuration without a realm. for example, as a cephadm service that does not specify anything for rgw_realm, rgw_zonegroup, or rgw_zone
2. verify with a client that radosgw is accessible
3. create an unrelated realm and set it as default:

$ radosgw-admin realm create --rgw-realm testrealm --default

4. restart the radosgw service

Actual results:

radosgw tries to load its zone inside that default realm and fails to start with "rgw main: failed to load zone: (2) No such file or directory"

Expected results:

radosgw ignores the realm and loads the existing "default" zone and zonegroup

Additional info:

Comment 1 Storage PM bot 2024-08-26 14:55:11 UTC

Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2024-11-25 09:07:11 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 8.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement updates), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2024:10216