Bug 2309198
Summary: | tox should recommend python3.11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Alyssa Coghlan <ncoghlan> |
Component: | python-tox | Assignee: | Miro Hrončok <mhroncok> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 40 | CC: | fge, mhroncok, mrunge, python-packagers-sig |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2024-09-02 22:10:58 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Alyssa Coghlan
2024-09-02 14:42:04 UTC
Never mind, the problem was in my queries, not the RPM metadata; I didn't check the reverse supplements declarations (as per https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/NVVUXSVSPFQOWIGBE2JNI67HEO7R63ZQ/) Sorry for the noise. > While illustrating how Fedora integrated its multiple Python versions into its recommended dependency for tox, I noticed that python3.11 didn't get added after the system Python package was bumped up to Python 3.12.
This is still a problem. But it isn't caused by missing Recommends, but generally by the way weak dependencies are handled by dnf :(
|