Bug 2309509

Summary:	[RFE:EPEL10] Please branch and build webkitgtk for EPEL10
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster>
Component:	webkitgtk	Assignee:	Michael Catanzaro <mcatanza>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel10	CC:	gnome-sig, kevin, mcatanza, philip.wyett, suraj.ghimire7, tpopela, xavier
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-12-17 23:11:51 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	2309490, 2309496, 2309498, 2309504, 2309508
Bug Blocks:	2303880

Description Gary Buhrmaster 2024-09-03 17:14:34 UTC

Please branch and build webkitgtk for EPEL10

webkitgtk will not be included with EL10 (it was in previous EL's), so an EPEL10 build is desired.



Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Gary Buhrmaster 2024-09-03 20:10:58 UTC

FWIW, your comment in webkitgtk (commit 862ac4af ) was prescient:

>    Remove RHEL conditions from spec file
>    
>    WebKitGTK is no longer part of ELN, so these are no longer needed.
>    
>    It's probably desired in EPEL, but extra dependencies can be packaged
>    for EPEL.

And, of course, no deed goes unpunished :-)

Comment 2 Michael Catanzaro 2024-09-04 13:55:48 UTC

Hey, I'm not planning to commit to maintaining this package in EPEL. The lifecycle is quite long and it will eventually become challenging to keep it updated.

I *could* do a build if you tell me how, but it's really probably not a good idea unless somebody else is willing to maintain it.

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2024-09-08 22:42:37 UTC

So, I have no idea why I was set in a override here for epel... :) 

I've reset it back to default, but I don't have any great desire to maintain this in epel10.

Comment 4 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-09-09 01:47:09 UTC

This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.

Comment 5 Michael Catanzaro 2024-12-17 23:11:51 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2332921 ***