Bug 2310911

Summary:	[RFE:EPEL10] EPEL10 branch of openh264
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Pat Riehecky <riehecky>
Component:	openh264	Assignee:	Wim Taymans <wtaymans>
Status:	ASSIGNED ---	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel10	CC:	carl, davide, klember, riehecky, wtaymans
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Pat Riehecky 2024-09-09 19:34:32 UTC

Description of problem:

Can openh264 be branched and built for EPEL10?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Kalev Lember 2024-09-17 13:48:54 UTC

I branched it for epel10 just now and requested a koji tag for holding the builds, https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12334

I'll kick off the builds as soon as we get the koji tag.

Comment 2 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2025-03-17 01:37:11 UTC

This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.

Comment 3 Pat Riehecky 2025-09-22 16:30:38 UTC

As I start to get more EL10 boxes, my interest in this has increased a bit.

Comment 4 Pat Riehecky 2025-12-03 18:40:34 UTC

I'd love to have this move forward.

Since we've no release for EPEL10 yet, should this be 2.6.0?