Bug 231118
Summary: | [NetApp 4.6 feat] setfacl not supported on NFSv4 mounted filesystem | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | Reporter: | Ricardo Labiaga <ricardo.labiaga> | ||||||
Component: | nfs-utils | Assignee: | Peter Staubach <staubach> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> | ||||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | high | ||||||||
Version: | 4.6 | CC: | andriusb, coughlan, ricardo.labiaga, sct, steved, xdl-redhat-bugzilla | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2007-07-18 18:11:37 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||||
Bug Blocks: | 217206, 232471, 232477 | ||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Ricardo Labiaga
2007-03-06 07:58:46 UTC
Created attachment 149325 [details]
strace of failed call to setfacl
Since this is a feature request, adding this to the RHEL 4.6 request list. FYI: If this is needed in RHEL 5.2, another bug should be created for RHEL 5. Corresponding bug for RHEL 5 can be found at bug 231231. Created attachment 149657 [details]
Purposed upstream patch
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request. You may appeal this decision by reopening this request. NetApp: Red Hat Engineering has reviewed this feature request and has concluded that support for Linux ACLs over NFSv4 is not stable enough upstream for inclusion into RHEL 4. Also, the design of NFSv4 makes it almost impossible to completely emulate Linux ACLs. The solution is to add protocol support for Linux ACLs in a future version of NFSv4, maybe NFSv4.2. Furthermore, with only a few more minor releases in the RHEL 4 time frame, this may seem unlikely at all for inclusion. |