Bug 231133
| Summary: | user bitlbee not created | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Matěj Cepl <mcepl> |
| Component: | bitlbee | Assignee: | Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla> |
| Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | mcepl |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2007-03-27 07:48:16 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Matěj Cepl
2007-03-06 13:19:47 UTC
And of course, rights on /var/lib/bitlbee were messed up too (it should be IMHO 700 bitlbee:root, not 700 root:bitlbee). That's *very* strange, because you're the first one reporting this. Can you
please execute /usr/sbin/getenforce to ensure, that it's not a SELinux problem?
Can you also please copy the output of "rpm -V bitlbee" here into? It looks
like your system is messed up, because the correct permissions of /var/lib/
bitlbee would be 700 bitlbee:bitlbee.
Finally, can you verify whether /usr/sbin/useradd exists and whether the shadow-
utils is not broken ("rpm -V shadow-utils")? I'm guessing the wrong permissions
are caused by the errornously not created bitlbee user which IMHO must be the
result of a partitially broken package or even system.
This bug report could be related to https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora- devel-list/2007-March/msg00394.html, if no further information are provided. Robert, this is not correct URL -- the one your provided points to the problems of glibc and fakeroot. How does it relate to this bug? Otherwise, [matej@chelcicky h_office]\$ rpm -V bitlbee S.5....T c /etc/xinetd.d/bitlbee [matej@chelcicky h_office]\$ ssh hubmaier Last login: Thu Mar 8 22:11:17 2007 from adsl2071.in.ipex.cz [matej@hubmaier ~]\$ rpm -V bitlbee S.5....T c /etc/xinetd.d/bitlbee [matej@hubmaier ~]\$ rpm -V shadow balíček shadow není nainstalován [matej@hubmaier ~]\$ man getenforce [matej@hubmaier ~]\$ getenforce Permissive [matej@hubmaier ~]\$ rpm -V shadow-utils ..?..... c /etc/default/useradd S.?..... /usr/sbin/groupadd S.?..... /usr/sbin/groupdel S.?..... /usr/sbin/groupmod S.?..... /usr/sbin/useradd S.?..... /usr/sbin/userdel S.?..... /usr/sbin/usermod [matej@hubmaier ~]\$ uname -a Linux hubmaier 2.6.18-8.el5xen #1 SMP Fri Jan 26 14:29:35 EST 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [matej@hubmaier ~]\$ Let me emphasize that it is x86_64, so it may be slightly weird somewhere. Hmm...unknown user bitlbee would mean that "/usr/sbin/useradd -r -s /sbin/ nologin -d /var/lib/bitlbee -M -c "BitlBee User" bitlbee" would have been failed. Do you have a bitlbee user for now or what happens at your system when the command gets executed again? I recognized x86_64, but from what I can see currently it doesn't look bitlbee related. I have created bitlbee user manually of course and now everything works just fine. I've written https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2007-March/ msg00168.html to search for maybe other reproducers in the Fedora world. The people I know using bitlbee at ix86, x86_64 or ppc didn't have this problem. Attempted, FC6, cannot reproduce. SELinux is permissive, it that helps. What does /var/log/secure say about the attempt at running useradd to create the bitlbee user? There should be a log entry for the time the rpm was installed. Michael, [matej@hubmaier ~]\$ sudo grep bitlbee /var/log/secure* /var/log/secure:Mar 12 13:57:08 hubmaier sudo: matej : TTY=pts/2 ; PWD=/home/matej ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/bin/grep bitlbee /var/log/secure /var/log/secure.1 /var/log/secure.1:Mar 6 13:15:23 hubmaier sudo: matej : TTY=pts/0 ; PWD=/home/matej ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/usr/bin/yum install bitlbee /var/log/secure.1:Mar 6 14:24:20 hubmaier sudo: matej : TTY=pts/0 ; PWD=/var/lib ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/bin/chmod g+w bitlbee/ /var/log/secure.1:Mar 6 14:24:29 hubmaier sudo: matej : TTY=pts/0 ; PWD=/var/lib ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/bin/chmod g+wx bitlbee/ /var/log/secure.1:Mar 6 14:24:37 hubmaier sudo: matej : TTY=pts/0 ; PWD=/var/lib ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/bin/chmod g+rwx bitlbee/ /var/log/secure.1:Mar 6 14:30:56 hubmaier sudo: matej : TTY=pts/3 ; PWD=/home/matej ; USER=bitlbee ; COMMAND=/usr/sbin/bitlbee /var/log/secure.1:Mar 6 14:31:26 hubmaier sudo: matej : TTY=pts/3 ; PWD=/home/matej ; USER=bitlbee ; COMMAND=/usr/sbin/bitlbee --help /var/log/secure.1:Mar 6 14:31:42 hubmaier sudo: matej : TTY=pts/3 ; PWD=/home/matej ; USER=bitlbee ; COMMAND=/usr/sbin/bitlbee -v -n /var/log/secure.1:Mar 6 14:33:57 hubmaier useradd[2547]: new group: name=bitlbee, GID=106 /var/log/secure.1:Mar 6 14:33:57 hubmaier useradd[2547]: new user: name=bitlbee, UID=100, GID=106, home=/usr/sbin/, shell=/sbin/nologin /var/log/secure.1:Mar 6 14:34:53 hubmaier sudo: matej : TTY=pts/3 ; PWD=/home/matej ; USER=bitlbee ; COMMAND=/usr/sbin/bitlbee -v -n /var/log/secure.1:Mar 6 14:35:43 hubmaier sudo: matej : TTY=pts/3 ; PWD=/var/lib ; USER=bitlbee ; COMMAND=/usr/sbin/bitlbee -v -n [matej@hubmaier ~]\$ which means that the only creation of bitlbee user was done by me by hand. As far as I can see, nobody is able to reproduce this problem including myself; one possible cause is https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2007- March/msg00171.html, but I'm likely to close this bug report (unfortunately not with a real fix). I don't think there was pre-existing bitlbee group -- this was really fresh install of new system. However, as I cannot reproduce it, let it be WORKSFORME. |