Bug 2311698
| Summary: | Unknown license DWPL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Miroslav Suchý <msuchy> |
| Component: | rgbds | Assignee: | Benjamin Lowry <ben> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | ben |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2024-09-30 22:33:44 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2310597 | ||
The insanely-long SPDX string is something I inherited from the previous packager, as rgbds has a long history (the codebase dates back to 1997 and has been relicensed numerous times). The upstream repo appears to have been entirely MIT-licensed since 2018 (https://github.com/gbdev/rgbds/commit/1a5c423984ca6cce1cb0b6b2100836bf4aa56e84 and https://github.com/gbdev/rgbds/commit/c071586ae53965cbdc8c10643b18e68dc9d2d56b), so I will change the SPDX to simply MIT. (for anyone curious: "DWPL" refers to the Do Whatever Public License, as seen in https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/BQH33QHLD3FRVXYJWG5AUX32PDSBT5GS/) license string changed to MIT in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rgbds/c/0e3889bec2f8a912cdc0d8431031d296da21e1f5?branch=rawhide |
Package rgbds uses License: DWPL and ISC and MIT and BSD The license DWPL is unknown. And I have no clue how to convert it to SPDX id. The rest of the string can be converted with little effort: $ license-fedora2spdx 'ISC and MIT and BSD' Warning: more options on how to interpret MIT. Possible options: ['Adobe-Glyph', 'BSL-1.0', 'Boehm-GC', 'HP-1986', 'HPND-sell-variant', 'HPND', 'ICU', 'MIT-CMU', 'MIT-Festival', 'MIT-Modern-Variant', 'MIT-enna', 'MIT-feh', 'MIT-open-group', 'MIT', 'NTP', 'SGI-B-2.0', 'SMLNJ', 'UnixCrypt', 'Xfig', 'libtiff', 'mpich2'] Warning: more options on how to interpret BSD. Possible options: ['BSD-1-Clause', 'BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD', 'BSD-2-Clause-Views', 'BSD-2-Clause', 'BSD-3-Clause-Modification', 'BSD-3-Clause', 'TCP-wrappers'] ISC AND {{pick MIT choice}} AND {{pick BSD choice}} If the DWPL is not on SPDX list then please open issue at https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data Reproducible: Always