Bug 2312578

Summary:	[rgw]:segafult (Floating point exception) in radosgw-admin thread, on executing bucket object shard with num_shards 0
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Madhavi Kasturi <mkasturi>
Component:	RGW	Assignee:	J. Eric Ivancich <ivancich>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Chaithra <ckulal>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:	Rivka Pollack <rpollack>
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	8.0	CC:	ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, ckulal, ivancich, mbenjamin, rpollack, tserlin
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	8.1
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ceph-19.2.1-147.el9cp	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	.`radosgw-admin` no longer crashes by non-positive values Previously, when running a `radosgw-admin bucket reshard` command, using a non-positive `--num-shards` value, such as a zero or a negative number, would cause `radosgw-admin` to crash. With this fix, the `--num-shards` value is checked an error message is emitted if a non-positive value is provided. As a result, `radosgw-admin` reshard commands run as expected, and are not able to create a crash.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2025-06-26 12:15:49 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2351689

Description Madhavi Kasturi 2024-09-16 17:01:42 UTC

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2025-06-26 12:15:49 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat Ceph Storage 8.1 security, bug fix, and enhancement updates), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9775