Bug 2312849

Summary:	Please branch and build python-immutables in epel10
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Ben Beasley <code>
Component:	python-immutables	Assignee:	Ben Beasley <code>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel10	CC:	carl, python-packagers-sig
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	python-immutables-0.20-4.el10_0	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-09-25 00:14:43 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1914423, 2310887

Description Ben Beasley 2024-09-17 13:44:41 UTC

Please branch and build python-immutables in epel10.

If you do not wish to maintain python-immutables in epel10,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package (FAS: music);
please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-immutables/adduser

Comment 1 Ben Beasley 2024-09-17 13:46:27 UTC

This is an avoidable (by omitting some tests) but useful test dependency for python-cattrs, bug 2310887.

I did a local mock build for EPEL10 based on Rawhide, and it worked fine.

Comment 2 Carl George 🤠 2024-09-18 04:12:57 UTC

You technically are already a co-maintainer via the python-packagers-sig, and that should allow you access to request an epel10 branch.  If it doesn't work for some reason I can step in and request the branch myself (and then go investigate why the request didn't work).

Once the epel10 branch exists, it looks like the best commit to fast-forward it to would be 6b8ab67.  I don't see a reason to include the Python 3.13 patch that was needed on Rawhide.

Comment 3 Ben Beasley 2024-09-18 12:18:33 UTC

(In reply to Carl George 🤠 from comment #2)
> You technically are already a co-maintainer via the python-packagers-sig,
> and that should allow you access to request an epel10 branch.  If it doesn't
> work for some reason I can step in and request the branch myself (and then
> go investigate why the request didn't work).

Unfortunately, that doesn’t work[1] due to [2].

If you can request the branch as an individual maintainer, I’ll be happy to take care of the rest.

> Once the epel10 branch exists, it looks like the best commit to fast-forward
> it to would be 6b8ab67.  I don't see a reason to include the Python 3.13
> patch that was needed on Rawhide.

Sounds good to me.

[1] https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/67267
[2] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12296

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2024-09-25 00:11:53 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2024-1bc72d9868 (python-cattrs-24.1.2-1.el10_0 and python-immutables-0.20-4.el10_0) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.0.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-1bc72d9868

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2024-09-25 00:14:43 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2024-1bc72d9868 (python-cattrs-24.1.2-1.el10_0 and python-immutables-0.20-4.el10_0) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.