Bug 2313083 (CVE-2024-46735)

Summary: CVE-2024-46735 kernel: ublk_drv: fix NULL pointer dereference in ublk_ctrl_start_recovery()
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: OSIDB Bzimport <bzimport>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Product Security DevOps Team <prodsec-dev>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: unspecifiedCC: dfreiber, drow, jburrell, vkumar
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2313171    
Bug Blocks:    

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2024-09-18 08:20:59 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ublk_drv: fix NULL pointer dereference in ublk_ctrl_start_recovery()

When two UBLK_CMD_START_USER_RECOVERY commands are submitted, the
first one sets 'ubq->ubq_daemon' to NULL, and the second one triggers
WARN in ublk_queue_reinit() and subsequently a NULL pointer dereference
issue.

Fix it by adding the check in ublk_ctrl_start_recovery() and return
immediately in case of zero 'ub->nr_queues_ready'.

  BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000028
  RIP: 0010:ublk_ctrl_start_recovery.constprop.0+0x82/0x180
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   ? __die+0x20/0x70
   ? page_fault_oops+0x75/0x170
   ? exc_page_fault+0x64/0x140
   ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
   ? ublk_ctrl_start_recovery.constprop.0+0x82/0x180
   ublk_ctrl_uring_cmd+0x4f7/0x6c0
   ? pick_next_task_idle+0x26/0x40
   io_uring_cmd+0x9a/0x1b0
   io_issue_sqe+0x193/0x3f0
   io_wq_submit_work+0x9b/0x390
   io_worker_handle_work+0x165/0x360
   io_wq_worker+0xcb/0x2f0
   ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x203/0x290
   ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x203/0x290
   ? __pfx_io_wq_worker+0x10/0x10
   ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50
   ? __pfx_io_wq_worker+0x10/0x10
   ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
   </TASK>