Bug 231737

Summary:	/usr/share/locale/be@latin/LC_MESSAGES is not owned
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component:	filesystem	Assignee:	Phil Knirsch <pknirsch>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	notting, rvokal
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-03-27 14:55:59 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	150225

Description Robert Scheck 2007-03-10 23:42:27 UTC

Description of problem:
The directory /usr/share/locale/be@latin/LC_MESSAGES is not owned by any 
package. It also looks to me whether "be@latin" is the same like "be" but
not with same charset etc. thus not provided by filesystem.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
glib2-2.12.11-1

How reproducible:
Everytime, see above.

Actual results:
/usr/share/locale/be@latin/LC_MESSAGES is not owned

Expected results:
Kill "be@latin" or clarify with Bill whether this directory should be added to 
the filesystem package. IMHO providing "be" and "be@latin" is unnecessary.

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2007-03-12 16:25:24 UTC

So, my question would be why we have:

sr@Latn
uz@Latn

but:

be@latin?

Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2007-03-12 16:30:45 UTC

I'm guessing because there's no standard anywhere regarding this. So When I 
would put rsc@mY$World" into some upstream package, this would get accepted
by downstream somehow surely, too.

Comment 3 Matthias Clasen 2007-03-24 05:32:54 UTC

glibc people prefer "latin" over "Latn".

Comment 4 Robert Scheck 2007-03-24 23:10:06 UTC

Can we get these latin vs. Latn to one common style so that they can be owned 
by the filesystem package?

Comment 5 Matthias Clasen 2007-03-26 21:13:21 UTC

> IMHO providing "be" and "be@latin" is unnecessary.

This is not true. One is Belarussian in Cyrillic (the default), the other
is Belarus in Latin.

Moving to filesystem.

Comment 6 Robert Scheck 2007-04-28 14:54:00 UTC

Bill, ping?

Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2007-05-01 04:40:32 UTC

We have an exception file for @modifier in filesystem; it would need to be added
there. Whether we want to simultaneously beat upstream into using latin instead
of Latn, I don't know.

Comment 8 Phil Knirsch 2008-03-27 14:55:59 UTC

Added be@latin to lang-exceptions for now.

Read ya, Phil