Bug 231890

Summary:	SELinux: remove secondary module stacking code
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Eric Paris <eparis>
Component:	kernel	Assignee:	Eric Paris <eparis>
Status:	CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA	QA Contact:	Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	sdsmall, triage
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	bzcl34nup
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-05-07 01:17:01 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Eric Paris 2007-03-12 19:48:14 UTC

There once was a bit of work done to support LSM module stacking.  It has since
been decided that this is a bad idea and ONLY selinux->capabilities stacking
should be allowed.

Thus upstream I need to remove the secondary ops which are not used for
capabilities and also try to move the used ops to actually directly call the
capability code.

Comment 1 Stephen Smalley 2007-10-17 14:15:00 UTC

...while still allowing for runtime disable of SELinux to fall back to
capabilities only.

Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-04-03 23:40:10 UTC

Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported
against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no
longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are
flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer
maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now,
we will automatically close it.

If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or
rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change
the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version
or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.)

Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled
these issues to this point.

The process we're following is outlined here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp

We will be following the process here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this
doesn't happen again.

Comment 3 Bug Zapper 2008-05-07 01:16:59 UTC

This bug has been in NEEDINFO for more than 30 days since feedback was
first requested. As a result we are closing it.

If you can reproduce this bug in the future against a maintained Fedora
version please feel free to reopen it against that version.

The process we're following is outlined here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp