Bug 2319031
Summary: | [Gnome software 47] No app data available | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | knipp30 | ||||
Component: | gnome-software | Assignee: | Milan Crha <mcrha> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
Version: | 41 | CC: | gnome-sig, mcrha, rhughes | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Desktop, Upgrades | ||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2024-10-16 07:49:15 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
knipp30
2024-10-15 23:52:33 UTC
Created attachment 2052223 [details]
output of gnome-software logs
I believe this can be closed. But I am providing what I did to fix this in case anyone else comes across this issue with F41: ~~~ pkill gnome-software sudo appstreamcli refresh-cache --force sudo appstreamcli refresh --force <<<<< not sure if needed but did it anyway pkcon repair ~~~ After doing the above, RPMs, Flatpaks, and Bios updates returned to gnome-software. More importantly, this also fixed an issue I was having where I could not see my bios update via fwupdmgr. I will keep this open for the Fedora team to review. Thanks for a bug report. I believe this is bug #2318784, no idea why would appstreamcli changes help, because there had been found it is due to incorrect libxmlb release. Maybe you've received a correct version before/while/after running the commands and restarted gnome-software used the fixed libxmlb? In any case, I mark this as a duplicate of the other bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2318784 *** |