Bug 2319060

Summary:	Please branch and build libnsl2 in epel10.
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Orion Poplawski <orion>
Component:	libnsl2	Assignee:	Orion Poplawski <orion>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fjanus, mmuzila, osloup
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	libnsl2-2.0.1-1.el10_0	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-10-16 14:05:21 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2319051

Description Orion Poplawski 2024-10-16 04:16:48 UTC

Please branch and build libnsl2 in epel10.

If you do not wish to maintain libnsl2 in epel10,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libnsl2/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.

I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: orion).

It appears to build fine: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=124872867

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Filip Januš 2024-10-16 07:23:29 UTC

Now you have the commit rights, so feel free to branch and build it. But I am wondering why do you need libnsl2 because this is a copy of libnsl with NIS support. So if you are not planning to build NIS in EPEL10 then you shouldn't require libnsl2.

Comment 2 Orion Poplawski 2024-10-16 13:54:57 UTC

Thank you.  This is for tcp_wrappers which requires the NIS support at the moment.