Bug 2319803
| Summary: | Please branch and build python-black for EPEL 10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Xavier Bachelot <xavier> |
| Component: | python-black | Assignee: | Christian Heimes <cheimes> |
| Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | carl, cheimes, mhroncok, python-packagers-sig |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2024-10-26 19:11:32 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2303880 | ||
|
Description
Xavier Bachelot
2024-10-18 16:58:15 UTC
> It is needed to build another package.
Which one?
From https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/epel/willit/epel10/status-wont-install.html Package: python3-hypothesis+cli-6.104.2-5.el10_0 (2024-09-23) Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides python3.12dist(black) >= 19.10~b0 needed by python3-hypothesis+cli-6.104.2-5.el10_0.noarch from epel10 - nothing provides python3.12dist(rich) >= 9 needed by python3-hypothesis+cli-6.104.2-5.el10_0.noarch from epel10 Package: python3-hypothesis+ghostwriter-6.104.2-5.el10_0 (2024-09-23) Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides python3.12dist(black) >= 19.10~b0 needed by python3-hypothesis+ghostwriter-6.104.2-5.el10_0.noarch from epel10 I guess the solution is to not build those extras on epel10. Anyway, this is maintained by Christian Heimes, so I let him lead here. I personally (as a co-maintainer) would be reluctant to maintain black for 10+ years while maintaining backward compatibility. I agree with Miro. Let's not add black to EPEL 10. In addition to the long term maintenance, I have an additional concerns: No package should have a dependency on python3.12dist(black) or python3-black. Black does not provide a stable Python API, https://black.readthedocs.io/en/stable/faq.html#does-black-have-an-api . The only API is the "black" command line interface. That's an understandable point about black, however upstream does declare it as a dependency in both the cli and ghostwriter extras. https://github.com/HypothesisWorks/hypothesis/blob/hypothesis-python-6.104.2/hypothesis-python/setup.py#L52 https://github.com/HypothesisWorks/hypothesis/blob/hypothesis-python-6.104.2/hypothesis-python/setup.py#L54 Here's a PR to remove the cli and ghostwriter extra subpackages, as well as disable the django and codemods extras on EPEL 10 because they're missing dependencies. It also enables the test suite, which should help prevent publishing uninstallable subpackages in the future. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-hypothesis/pull-request/29 That PR has been merged and published, so the uninstallable subpackages that were driving this request are gone now. |