Bug 2323513
| Summary: | gdb-add-index: Failed to find a useable GDB binary now seems to kill rpm builds | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jan Pazdziora <adelton> |
| Component: | gdb | Assignee: | Keith Seitz <keiths> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | ahajkova, fweimer, guinevere, jan, keiths, kevinb, mcermak, mjw, mkolar, ptoscano, suraj.ghimire7 |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Regression |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | gdb-15.2-2.fc42 gdb-15.2-2.fc41 gdb-15.2-2.fc40 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2024-11-07 00:24:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jan Pazdziora
2024-11-03 15:30:01 UTC
I followed the given steps (more or less) on both f40 and f41 and could not reproduce this: $ fedpkg clone -a -b f41 patch && cd patch $ fedpkg srpm $ sudo dnf builddep -y ./*.src.rpm $ rpmbuildlocal -ba patch.spec |& tee make.out From make.out, I see: + /usr/bin/find-debuginfo -j4 --strict-build-id -m -i --build-id-seed 2.7.6-25.fc41 --unique-debug-suffix -2.7.6-25.fc41.x86_64 --unique-debug-src-base patch-2.7.6-25.fc41.x86_64 --run-dwz --dwz-low-mem-die-limit 10000000 --dwz-max-die-limit 110000000 -S debugsourcefiles.list /home/fedora41/patch/patch-2.7.6-build/patch-2.7.6 find-debuginfo: starting Extracting debug info from 1 files DWARF-compressing 1 files sepdebugcrcfix: Updated 1 CRC32s, 0 CRC32s did match. Creating .debug symlinks for symlinks to ELF files Copying sources found by 'debugedit -l' to /usr/src/debug/patch-2.7.6-25.fc41.x86_64 2046 blocks find-debuginfo: done I did this on a brand new install of f41 workstation VM and dnf update. No other changes. If find-debuginfo.sh is saying gdb is missing, is gdb installed? What version of debugedit is installed? Rawhide ... my bad. Rechecking on rawhide. Unfortunately, even on rawhide VM (updated 10h00 PST Nov 3), this behaves no differently than f40 or f41. For some reason, find-debuginfo.sh thinks that GDB is not found. Is `GDB' set in the environment? Is the gdb-headless package installed? Does /usr/libexec/gdb exist? I'm doing my tests using the registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide container (that's what I ultimately run upstream tests in in GitHub Actions). The rpm-build pulls in gdb-minimal-15.2-1.fc42.x86_64, so that one is installed. It looks like a missing dependency on “which”, which was likely installed due to other dependencies before. Alternatively, gdb-add-index could replace the use of ”which” with “command -v”. (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #5) > It looks like a missing dependency on “which”, which was likely installed > due to other dependencies before. Alternatively, gdb-add-index could replace > the use of ”which” with “command -v”. I worked on a bug earlier this year which was supposed to address the 'which' problem. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275274 gdb.spec now has a "Requires" for which, but its for the headless package. Perhaps a similar Requires is also needed for the minimal package? Jan, if I give you a scratch build RPM of new gdb, are you able to test to affirm that Florian's hypothesis is correct? Yes, sure. *** Bug 2324145 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** (In reply to Kevin Buettner from comment #6) > gdb.spec now has a "Requires" for which, but its for the headless package. > Perhaps a similar Requires is also needed for the minimal package? Yes, exactly, "gdb-minimal" needs to depend on "which"; see bug 2324145 comment 1 for minimal reproducer instructions using a Fedora Rawhide container. Also, it would be nice to fix this in all the supported Fedora versions (i.e. 39+), as the dependency is missing also in older versions. This comes from a fedora local patch https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdb/blob/rawhide/f/gdb-add-index.patch The upstream code already uses command -v (which is posix shell) instead of which. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdb/pull-request/153 gdb-add-index.patch: Replace which with command -v I've reviewed Mark's PR, did a scratch build and followed the directions in 2324145 to verify: $ podman run -it --rm --pull=newer fedora:rawhide [root@acc9e7112292 /]# dnf --setopt install_weak_deps=False install -y debugedit [root@a4625b100393 /]# gdb-add-index gdb-add-index: Failed to find a useable GDB binary [root@a4625b100393 /]# dnf --setopt install_weak_deps=False install -y https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8835/125558835/gdb-minimal-15.2-2.fc42.x86_64.rpm [root@a4625b100393 /]# gdb-add-index usage: gdb-add-index [-dwarf-5] FILE So AFAICT this should work, and I will do a build immediately. FEDORA-2024-90ecac1fea (gdb-15.2-2.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-90ecac1fea FEDORA-2024-90ecac1fea (gdb-15.2-2.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. Thanks for the errata. Could you do the same for Fedora 41? It seems something changed there as well recently so the same issue is now present in registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:41 containers. FEDORA-2024-1546079ac0 (gdb-15.2-2.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-1546079ac0 FEDORA-2024-cf449a05a4 (gdb-15.2-2.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-cf449a05a4 FEDORA-2024-cf449a05a4 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-cf449a05a4` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-cf449a05a4 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2024-1546079ac0 has been pushed to the Fedora 41 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-1546079ac0` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-1546079ac0 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2024-1546079ac0 (gdb-15.2-2.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2024-cf449a05a4 (gdb-15.2-2.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |