Bug 2323769
| Summary: | Please branch and build etckeeper in epel10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Michel Lind <michel> |
| Component: | etckeeper | Assignee: | Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel10 | CC: | alberto, collinl, furlongm, swelljoe, thomas.moschny |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | etckeeper-1.18.22-3.el10_1 etckeeper-1.18.22-3.el10_0 | Doc Type: | --- |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-07-21 00:22:39 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 2323770 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 1914423 | ||
|
Description
Michel Lind
2024-11-05 02:43:13 UTC
Any movement on this? Looks like there are folks willing to work on it. I'd also be willing to test and make a PR with any needed changes, or whatever, if no one else wants to do it. I'd rather not add it to my own repos if it's going to appear in EPEL some time soon or if I can do something to encourage it to appear in EPEL repos soon. I would also like to see etckeeper included in the epel10 repository. Sorry folks for the delay, will look into it soon. But we need to check DNF compatibility... Fedora 40 (and onward) has `etckeeper` and `etckeeper-dnf` and they seem to work fine, though I haven't dug into it much, I see it doing the things I would expect on my Fedora systems, including committing changes before a dnf run. I believe EL10 was branched from Fedora 40. EL10 seems to have dnf 4.20, and I have a Fedora system with dnf 4.23 that works. I'll be quite surprised it the Fedora 40 package can't just be rebuilt for EL10. But, I'll give it a try tonight after work. FEDORA-EPEL-2025-2601cdaa8f (etckeeper-1.18.22-3.el10_1) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.1. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-2601cdaa8f FEDORA-EPEL-2025-2601cdaa8f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-2601cdaa8f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2025-fe52c2607e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-fe52c2607e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. Thank you! 🎉 FEDORA-EPEL-2025-2601cdaa8f (etckeeper-1.18.22-3.el10_1) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-EPEL-2025-fe52c2607e (etckeeper-1.18.22-3.el10_0) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |