Bug 2324362

Summary: Review Request: golang-go4-unsafe-assume-no-moving-gc - For playing unsafe games with Go's runtime garbage collector
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Tom.Rix
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Mikel Olasagasti Uranga <mikel>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: Man2Dev, mikel, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: AutomationTriaged
Target Release: ---Flags: mikel: fedora-review+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-12-24 13:30:05 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2318425    

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-11-07 13:00:53 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8226253
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2324362-golang-go4org-unsafe-assume-no-moving-gc/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08226253-golang-go4org-unsafe-assume-no-moving-gc/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2024-11-07 14:18:09 UTC
Command `go2rpm -q -f https://github.com/go4org/unsafe-assume-no-moving-gc/ go4.org/unsafe/assume-no-moving-gc` creates golang-go4-unsafe-assume-no-moving-gc.spec but the uploaded spec is golang-go4org-unsafe-assume-no-moving-gc. go4 vs go4org. Is there a reason for this?

> %bcond check 0

If there is a reason to disable check, add a comment explaining why.

Comment 3 Tom.Rix 2024-11-09 14:34:45 UTC
Spec URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/golang-go4-unsafe-assume-no-moving-gc.spec
SPRM URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/golang-go4-unsafe-assume-no-moving-gc-0-0.1.20231121gitb99613f.fc42.src.rpm

I regenerated the spec from your suggestion.
I blame operator error for the last version :)

Comment 4 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2024-11-09 15:04:06 UTC
Golang Package Review
==============

This package was generated using go2rpm, which simplifies the review.

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


- [x] The latest version is packaged or packaging an earlier version is justified.
- [x] The License tag reflects the package contents and uses the correct identifiers.
- [x] The package builds successfully in mock.
- [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review).
- [x] There are no relevant rpmlint errors.
- [x] The package runs tests in %check.
- [x] `%goipath` is set correctly.
- [-] The package's binaries don't conflict with binaries already in the distribution. (Some Go projects include utility binaries with very generic names)
- [-] There are no `%{_bindir}/*` wildcards in %files. (go2rpm includes these by default)
- [x] The package does not use `%gometa -f` if it has dependents that still build for %ix86.
- [x] The package complies with the Golang and general Packaging Guidelines.

Package approved! On import, don't forget to do the following:

- [ ] Add the package to release-monitoring.org
- [ ] Give go-sig privileges (at least commit) on the package
- [ ] Close the review bug by referencing its ID in the rpm changelog and the Bodhi ticket.
- [ ] Consider configuring Packit service to help with maintenance

Thanks!

Comment 5 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-11-09 17:13:47 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-go4-unsafe-assume-no-moving-gc