Bug 2325776 (CVE-2024-11168)

Summary: CVE-2024-11168 python: Improper validation of IPv6 and IPvFuture addresses
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: OSIDB Bzimport <bzimport>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Product Security DevOps Team <prodsec-dev>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: unspecifiedCC: carnil, dfreiber, drow, jburrell, jeder, luizcosta, nweather, prodsec-dev, rbobbitt, vkumar, zkayyali
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---Flags: carnil: needinfo? (prodsec-dev)
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
A flaw was found in Python. The `urllib.parse.urlsplit()` and `urlparse()` functions improperly validated bracketed hosts (`[]`), allowing hosts that weren't IPv6 or IPvFuture compliant. This behavior was not conformant to RFC 3986 and was potentially vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) if a URL is processed by more than one URL parser.
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2325784, 2325785, 2325786, 2325787, 2325788, 2325789    
Bug Blocks:    

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2024-11-12 22:01:21 UTC 
The urllib.parse.urlsplit() and urlparse() functions improperly validated bracketed hosts (`[]`), allowing hosts that weren't IPv6 or IPvFuture. This behavior was not conformant to RFC 3986 and potentially enabled SSRF if a URL is processed by more than one URL parser.
Comment 2 Salvatore Bonaccorso 2024-11-13 08:06:09 UTC 
Is this CVE assignment for https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/64470 ?
Comment 3 Salvatore Bonaccorso 2024-11-13 08:34:04 UTC 
In meanwhile the CVE entry exists, so this is https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11168
Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2024-12-04 08:12:29 UTC 
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8

Via RHSA-2024:10779 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:10779
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2024-12-12 09:15:51 UTC 
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

Via RHSA-2024:10983 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:10983