Bug 2328014
| Summary: | dlib fails to build with Python 3.14: AttributeError: module 'pkgutil' has no attribute 'find_loader' | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Karolina Surma <ksurma> |
| Component: | dlib | Assignee: | Onuralp SEZER <thunderbirdtr> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 42 | CC: | arthur, code, gui1ty, ksurma, mhroncok, neuro-sig, thunderbirdtr |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | dlib-19.24.8-3.fc42 dlib-19.24.8-3.fc40 dlib-19.24.8-3.fc41 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-03-24 01:32:43 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2322407 | ||
The fix for the deprecated `pkgutil.find_loader()` is trivial. However, the package currently fails to build on Koji aarch64 builders. In Copr the package appears to be building just fine. I've got no idea how to troubleshoot that issue. (In reply to Sandro from comment #1) > The fix for the deprecated `pkgutil.find_loader()` is trivial. However, the > package currently fails to build on Koji aarch64 builders. In Copr the > package appears to be building just fine. I've got no idea how to > troubleshoot that issue. I filed bug 2337089 to track this. I can also reproduce the crash in qemu-user-static emulation, but as I noted in the bug, I can’t seem to run dtest under gdb in emulation. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 42 development cycle. Changing version to 42. FEDORA-2025-118d5710f8 (dlib-19.24.8-3.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-118d5710f8 FEDORA-2025-3ac216fc54 (dlib-19.24.8-3.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-3ac216fc54 FEDORA-2025-f045e7d0ee (dlib-19.24.8-3.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-f045e7d0ee FEDORA-2025-f045e7d0ee has been pushed to the Fedora 42 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-f045e7d0ee` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-f045e7d0ee See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2025-118d5710f8 has been pushed to the Fedora 41 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-118d5710f8` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-118d5710f8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2025-3ac216fc54 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-3ac216fc54` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-3ac216fc54 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2025-f045e7d0ee (dlib-19.24.8-3.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2025-3ac216fc54 (dlib-19.24.8-3.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2025-118d5710f8 (dlib-19.24.8-3.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |
dlib fails to build with Python 3.14.0a2. ==================================== ERRORS ==================================== ___________ ERROR collecting tools/python/test/test_numpy_returns.py ___________ tools/python/test/test_numpy_returns.py:32: in <module> @pytest.mark.skipif(not utils.is_numpy_installed(), reason="requires numpy") tools/python/test/utils.py:39: in is_numpy_installed if pkgutil.find_loader("numpy"): E AttributeError: module 'pkgutil' has no attribute 'find_loader' =========================== short test summary info ============================ ERROR tools/python/test/test_numpy_returns.py - AttributeError: module 'pkgut... !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Interrupted: 1 error during collection !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! =============================== 1 error in 1.15s =============================== According to https://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.14.html#pkgutil Remove deprecated pkgutil.get_loader() and pkgutil.find_loader(). These had previously raised a DeprecationWarning since Python 3.12. (Contributed by Bénédikt Tran in gh-97850.) For the build logs, see: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.14/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08291441-dlib/ For all our attempts to build dlib with Python 3.14, see: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.14/package/dlib/ Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.14: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.14/ Let us know here if you have any questions. Python 3.14 is planned to be included in Fedora 43. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all pre-releases of Python 3.14. A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon. We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side.