Bug 232848
Summary: | failed boot of fc7 test2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | kako_j |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | F8 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-12-10 20:58:46 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
kako_j
2007-03-18 21:21:47 UTC
This isn't obvious anywhere, but Fedora 7 test bugs should be filed against the "devel" version. In the fc6.92 this also occurs as follows: --------------- io scheduler noop registered io scheduler anticipatory registered io scheduler deadline registered io scheduler cfq registered (default) PCI: Bypassing VIA 8237 APIC De-Assert Message pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5 PM: Adding info for platform:vesafb.0 --------------------- As I can see in a working system, after this message should be continued with two lines with ACPI messages, but before it the system freezes, as I can't switch off-on with numlock. --- Additionally: this box works for two years without problems, momently with FC-6 for 20-22 hours a day, memtest86+ can't find any errors. might be this bug is somewere around the new kernel features. I've tried to compile a new v2.6.21 kernel from vanilla, and the problem is the same. Dont't know what the differences between 2.6.20-1.2925.fc6 and 2.6.21, and what common changes are in 2.6.21 and fc6-test-x kernels, but there may be the bug Sounds very much like a kernel ACPI bug, so reassigning to kernel. Read ya, Phil maybe, thatswhy I was already sent this bug to the kernel developers: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8454 was test3 any better? |