Bug 2328692

Summary: Review Request: ghc-itanium-abi - An implementation of name mangling/demangling for the Itanium ABI
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Frank Dedden <frank>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Jens Petersen <petersen>
Status: ASSIGNED --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: haskell-devel, package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/itanium-abi
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8311379 to 8994738 none

Description Frank Dedden 2024-11-25 15:22:44 UTC
Spec URL: https://fdedden.fedorapeople.org/ghc-itanium-abi.spec
SRPM URL: https://fdedden.fedorapeople.org/ghc-itanium-abi-0.1.2-1.fc42.src.rpm

Description:
Currently supports everything in the standard but templates and C++11.
Support for these will be added. Includes a name mangler, demangler, and pretty
printer.

Fedora Account System Username: fdedden

Comment 1 Frank Dedden 2024-11-25 15:22:46 UTC
This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=126248426

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2024-11-25 15:32:33 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8311379
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2328692-ghc-itanium-abi/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08311379-ghc-itanium-abi/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2025-04-18 11:29:44 UTC
You probably want to update to 0.1.3, which should build with 9.8 without needed a revision.

Configuring itanium-abi-0.1.2...
Error: Setup: Encountered missing or private dependencies:
text >=0.11 && <2.1

Otherwise a revision can be done with:

cabal-tweak-dep-ver text '< 2.1' '< 2.2'

in the %setup section.

Comment 4 Frank Dedden 2025-05-04 11:33:14 UTC
Spec URL: https://fdedden.fedorapeople.org/ghc-itanium-abi.spec
SRPM URL: https://fdedden.fedorapeople.org/ghc-itanium-abi-0.1.3-1.fc43.src.rpm

I have regenerated the .spec file for the newer 0.1.3 version.

Comment 5 vwincomliga788 2025-05-04 11:54:34 UTC Comment hidden (spam)
Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2025-05-04 11:54:50 UTC
Created attachment 2088318 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8311379 to 8994738

Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2025-05-04 11:54:53 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8994738
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2328692-ghc-itanium-abi/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08994738-ghc-itanium-abi/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 8 vwincomliga788 2025-05-04 12:01:31 UTC Comment hidden (spam)
Comment 9 vwincomliga788 2025-05-04 12:02:02 UTC Comment hidden (spam)
Comment 10 vwincomliga788 2025-05-04 12:02:22 UTC Comment hidden (spam)
Comment 11 vwincomliga788 2025-05-04 12:02:35 UTC Comment hidden (spam)