Bug 2330380
| Summary: | Missing update of flatpak-spawn causes Evolution to fail on start | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | nipele.dekisi |
| Component: | flatpak-xdg-utils | Assignee: | Owen Taylor <otaylor> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 41 | CC: | bruce, david.laehnemann, fedhex, gnome-sig, intrep, mark, mcatanza, otaylor |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Upgrades |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2024-12-14 03:27:27 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
nipele.dekisi
2024-12-04 16:58:08 UTC
Link to discussion: https://discourse.gnome.org/t/how-to-fix-evolution-not-starting-after-update/25389 The same root cause triggers a crash for the Geary flatpak installed on Silverblue 41; I assume the same would happen for the flatpak installed in the regular workstation edition, but I haven't checked. Also I looked in a Fedora 40 flatpak installation and the same old version of flatpak-spawn is present (1.0.5-6.fc40), the one without the option, so it would seem that Geary or Evolution flatpaks would fail on f40 in the same way. (I guess that would warrant a bump in this bug's priority/severity now that there are 2 relatively major applications affected across multiple fedora versions/flavors) I can confirm, that this bug also affects Fedora 40. I have run the exact same commands as the original poster, and I get the exact same error message, with only timestamps and the WebProcess hash value differing. So I would second the vote for a higher severity. FEDORA-2024-6137ee4ecc (flatpak-xdg-utils-1.0.6-1.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-6137ee4ecc FEDORA-FLATPAK-2024-ca717575f5 (flatpak-runtime-f41-16 and flatpak-sdk-f41-13) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41 Flatpaks. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2024-ca717575f5 FEDORA-FLATPAK-2024-ca717575f5 has been pushed to the Fedora 41 Flatpaks testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2024-ca717575f5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2024-6137ee4ecc has been pushed to the Fedora 41 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-6137ee4ecc` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-6137ee4ecc See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-FLATPAK-2024-947f40556a has been pushed to the Fedora 41 Flatpaks testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2024-947f40556a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-FLATPAK-2024-947f40556a (flatpak-runtime-f41-17 and flatpak-sdk-f41-14) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 Flatpaks stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2024-6137ee4ecc (flatpak-xdg-utils-1.0.6-1.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. *** Bug 2330602 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |