Bug 2330615
Summary: | Review Request: tcl8 - Tool Command Language, pronounced tickle, version 8 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad> | ||||
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Miro Hrončok <mhroncok> | ||||
Status: | RELEASE_PENDING --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | mhroncok, package-review | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | mhroncok:
fedora-review+
|
||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
URL: | http://tcl.sourceforge.net/ | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | Type: | --- | |||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Jaroslav Škarvada
2024-12-05 17:11:48 UTC
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8344720 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2330615-tcl8/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08344720-tcl8/fedora-review/review.txt Found issues: - License file license.terms is not marked as %license Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text - Package has .a files: tcl8-devel. Does not provide -static: tcl8-devel. Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. Comparing the package with tcl fist. I am not entirely sure this needs an epoch set, but there is no harm in having it. Perhaps also drop this, and let it be obsoleted by the tcl 9 package? Obsoletes: tcl-tcldict <= %{vers} You might want to be more specific in %files, not to accidentally conflict. E.g. instead of %{_bindir}/tclsh* use %{_bindir}/tclsh8* The rest of the differences make sense. ============================================================ About the spec as-is: - Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if present. Note: Package has .a files: tcl8-devel. Does not provide -static: tcl8-devel. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries tcl8-devel.x86_64: E: static-library-without-debuginfo /usr/lib64/libtclstub8.6.a tcl8-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/lib64/libtclstub8.6.a I suggest dropping this entirely. --------- No need to number the Sources and Patches. --------- No need for %ldconfig_scriptlets. license.terms should probably be %license, not %doc. Thanks for the review. New version: Spec URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/tcl8/tcl8.spec SRPM URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/tcl8/tcl8-8.6.15-8.fc42.src.rpm Regarding the static stubs: https://fedorapeople.org/~tmz/guidelines/packaging-guidelines/Tcl/ I thought there is an exception for it. It cannot be easily disabled, only patched out which may break things and cause the compat not to be the drop-in replacement. Created attachment 2061977 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8344720 to 8373815
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8373815 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2330615-tcl8/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08373815-tcl8/fedora-review/review.txt Found issues: - Package has .a files: tcl8-devel. Does not provide -static: tcl8-devel. Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. Package APPROVED. The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tcl8 |