Bug 233091
| Summary: | libtiff on alpha | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Oliver Falk <oliver> |
| Component: | libtiff | Assignee: | Tom Lane <tgl> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | hhorak |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 3.8.2-8.fc7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2007-09-25 08:28:09 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Tom. Can you please do this? *knock* *knock* ping flood ping :-) ping again I didn't like that solution since it doesn't help for other architectures. It seems best to just disable the whole patch on non-multilib arches --- I've done it that way for my other packages and not been complained at. Would you look at the current rawhide and see if it meets your need? If not, why not exactly? I don't liked that solution as well, but just modified the old spec in a way that fixed the problem... Well, the current solution is - of course - far better! Thx works! libtiff-3.8.2-8.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. libtiff-3.8.2-8.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |
Please include the following: Index: libtiff.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/dist/devel/libtiff/libtiff.spec,v retrieving revision 1.48 diff -r1.48 libtiff.spec 66c66 < %ifarch x86_64 s390x ia64 ppc64 --- > %ifarch x86_64 s390x ia64 ppc64 alpha