Bug 2331411

Summary: [rfe] ceph orch ls does not display comma-separated Ports for RGW service
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Vidushi Mishra <vimishra>
Component: CephadmAssignee: Kushal Deb <kdeb>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Sayalee <saraut>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 8.0CC: adking, cephqe-warriors, kdeb, tserlin
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: 8.1   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-19.2.1-90.el9cp Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-06-26 12:20:00 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Vidushi Mishra 2024-12-10 17:14:35 UTC
Description of problem:

When multiple RGW instances are deployed via the cephadm orchestrator, the 'ceph orch ls' command does not display the ports as a comma-separated list, unlike other services such as alert-manager. 

Instead, the PORTS field for RGW services is shown as ?:80, making it unclear which other ports are in use.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ceph version 19.2.0-55.el9cp 

How reproducible:
always

Enhancement: Update the ceph orch ls implementation to fetch and display the ports for RGW services in a comma-separated format, just like it does for services like alertmanager.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2025-06-26 12:20:00 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat Ceph Storage 8.1 security, bug fix, and enhancement updates), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9775