Bug 2331781
Summary: | cephadm generates nfs-ganesha config with incorrect server_scope value | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | jeff.a.smith |
Component: | Cephadm | Assignee: | Adam King <adking> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Manisha Saini <msaini> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.0 | CC: | cephqe-warriors, ffilz, mobisht, msaini, tserlin |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 8.1 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | ceph-19.2.1-33.el9cp | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2025-06-26 12:20:06 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
jeff.a.smith
2024-12-11 20:39:49 UTC
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity. I set severity to medium as the default ganesha config produced by cephadm results in a nfs-ganesha cluster such that each ganesha instance is configured with a unique value for "Server_Scope" (the default behavior embeds hostname in Server_Scope). The default nfs-ganesha config cannot support HANFS. The impact is that NFS4.1+ clients of a ganesha instance that is moved to another node will never be able to reclaim/recover their protocol state. This problem is easily mitigated by setting a Server_Scope value that is that same for all ganesha instances. We set Server_Scope to the nfs cluster name. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat Ceph Storage 8.1 security, bug fix, and enhancement updates), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9775 |