Bug 2332264

Summary: Review Request: mkdocs-bootstrap - Bootstrap theme for MkDocs
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Davide Cavalca <davide>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Michel Lind <michel>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: michel, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: michel: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: http://mkdocs.github.io/mkdocs-bootstrap/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-12-16 11:58:49 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Davide Cavalca 2024-12-13 11:17:06 UTC
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/mkdocs-bootstrap/mkdocs-bootstrap.spec
SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/mkdocs-bootstrap/mkdocs-bootstrap-1.1.1-1.fc42.src.rpm

Description:
Bootstrap theme for MkDocs.

Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca

Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2024-12-13 11:17:08 UTC
This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=126793199

Comment 2 Davide Cavalca 2024-12-13 11:17:30 UTC
This package will need to be unretired: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mkdocs-bootstrap

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2024-12-13 11:21:13 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8389613
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2332264-mkdocs-bootstrap/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08389613-mkdocs-bootstrap/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mkdocs-bootstrap
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 4 Michel Lind 2024-12-13 11:53:14 UTC
Package was generated with pyp2spec, simplifying the review.

- package builds and installs without errors on rawhide
- test suite is run and all unit tests pass
- latest version of the sotware is packaged
- license matches upstream specification (BSD-2-Clause) and is acceptable for Fedora
- license file is included with %license in %files
- package complies with the Python Packaging Guidelines

Package APPROVED.

===

Recommended post-import python-packagers-sig tasks (use `fedora-sig-onboard onboard pkgname`:

- add @python-packagers-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer

- track package in koschei for all built branches

Comment 5 Davide Cavalca 2024-12-13 12:02:33 UTC
Unretirement ticket: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12502

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2024-12-16 11:54:13 UTC
FEDORA-2024-b1369e2a40 (mkdocs-bootstrap-1.1.1-1.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-b1369e2a40

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2024-12-16 11:58:49 UTC
FEDORA-2024-b1369e2a40 (mkdocs-bootstrap-1.1.1-1.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.