Bug 2334647
| Summary: | Browser integration fails: must expose the Flatpak wrapper binary | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Emi Matchu <oss> | 
| Component: | keepassxc | Assignee: | Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi> | 
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | 
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 41 | CC: | daniel, germano.massullo, mikel, nebulon42, nixuser, nonamedotc, norbert+redhat, redhat | 
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Desktop | 
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | aarch64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-01-03 01:36:40 UTC | Type: | --- | 
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | 
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| 
        
          Description
        
        
          Emi Matchu
        
        
        
        
        
          2024-12-28 05:08:41 UTC
        
       *** Bug 2334705 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Assigning to Yaakov as he is the creator of the Fedora flatpak package as per https://src.fedoraproject.org/flatpaks/keepassxc @Yaakov can you add a README file in the repo specifying how and/or where to report issues? This will require modifications to both the spec file and container.yaml; PR filed for the former. (In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #3) > This will require modifications to both the spec file and container.yaml; PR > filed for the former. PR merged. I am still puzzled by the choice of installing a flatpak over a well integrated Fedora rpm package Personally, my rationale for preferring Flatpaks by default is that I appreciate the ability to explicitly grant and deny permissions. Even when I reasonably trust the authors and repository maintainers, it makes more sense to me to explicitly choose the permissions an application should have—and accept the additional maintenance burden—rather than grant it full access to my user account in exchange for the guarantee that it runs smoothly the first time. That said, I can't speak to whether it's worth the Fedora project's time to maintain this package when there are alternatives available! I trust your team's judgment on this, and if you feel it's not worth the maintenance effort, that's a choice that I as a user would absolutely respect. Thank you for taking the time to fix this issue! FEDORA-FLATPAK-2024-e14ea95284 (keepassxc-flatpak-2.7.9-5) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41 Flatpaks. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2024-e14ea95284 FEDORA-FLATPAK-2024-e14ea95284 has been pushed to the Fedora 41 Flatpaks testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2024-e14ea95284 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-FLATPAK-2024-e14ea95284 (keepassxc-flatpak-2.7.9-5) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 Flatpaks stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |