Bug 2336263
Summary: | Singular fails to build with GCC 15 ("extra.cc:3850:11: error: 'convSingPFlintP' was not declared in this scope") | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm> |
Component: | Singular | Assignee: | Jerry James <loganjerry> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | extras-orphan, jwakely, rdieter, sipoyare |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2025-01-17 18:17:13 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 2333037 |
Description
Dave Malcolm
2025-01-07 22:37:18 UTC
There's an upstream issue about GCC 15 compatibility although it seems to be a different error: https://github.com/Singular/Singular/issues/1242 This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component. Patch available upstream: https://github.com/Singular/Singular/commit/338804e105a7f26354ea1aed723ba65f9ccb3320 This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component. Looks like this got built successfully during the mass rebuild without the upstream fix: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2616859 Maybe this was an unrelated issue, or maybe even a gcc bug that got fixed between the prebuild and rebuild? It was actually a problem in a flint header. A noreturn attribute was specified in a non-C23-compliant way. I pushed a fix for that on Tuesday so that flint-using packages wouldn't all fail the mass rebuild. I'm glad that worked for Singular, at least. Awesome, I'll close this off then, thanks! |