Bug 2337051
Summary: | Review Request: retroarch-assets - Assets needed for RetroArch - e.g. menu drivers, etc | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Artem <ego.cordatus> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | package-review, quantum.analyst |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
URL: | https://www.libretro.com/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | Type: | --- | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 2290413 |
Description
Artem
2025-01-11 00:21:38 UTC
This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=127751517 Rationale: This more like re-review. Rationale: RetroArch now using release tags for their sub-projects like assets, databases, etc (see: https://github.com/libretro/retroarch-assets/issues/414). Splitting RPM sub-packages to separate packages will make it easier updating/building RetroArch and all it's stuff. It also could simplify Spec file for RPM Fusion build and speedup building process, save disc space (assets SRPM itself is about ~470MB). retroarch-assets would be better to keep as weak dep since some users still prefer to download it manually from app itself. Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8500573 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2337051-retroarch-assets/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08500573-retroarch-assets/fedora-review/review.txt Found issues: - License file DejaVuSans.LICENSE.txt is not marked as %license Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string. Your Source0 URL appears broken. I don't know if the short_url macro is really helping there either since it's only used in the one place. You have marked the `sounds` directory as containing CC-BY-NC-3.0; this license is not permitted in Fedora, and I don't see you removing these files. It's also not listed in the License? You have marked bundled fonts (and it would be helpful to comment where they are), but don't have their license in License. |