Bug 233889

Summary: netatalk, netatalk-devel: unowned directories
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael>
Component: netatalkAssignee: Martin Nagy <mnagy>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: hripps, mbarabas
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: EasyFix
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: netatalk-2.0.3-17.fc9 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-02-25 09:35:12 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
diff against cvs none

Description Michael Schwendt 2007-03-25 16:56:13 UTC
=> netatalk - 4:2.0.3-9.fc7.i386
/usr/lib/atalk

=> netatalk-devel - 4:2.0.3-9.fc7.i386
/usr/include/netatalk

Comment 1 Martin Nagy 2008-02-23 16:13:28 UTC
Could please be more verbose in describing your problem?

Comment 2 Michael Schwendt 2008-02-23 17:48:15 UTC
Created attachment 295711 [details]
diff against cvs

The term "unowned directory" (or less commonly "orphaned
directory") is used in conjunction with packages that store
files in a directory, but don't include the directory itself.
When listing the list of files in the packages (e.g. with
"rpm -qlv ..." or rpmls from the UsefulScripts Wiki page),
you can see whether your package includes the "drwxr-xr-x"
entry for a directory and not just files within it.

For a long time, rpm created unowned directories with insufficient
file access permissions depending on root's umask. As another
problem, unowned directories are not removed when erasing a
package.

Finally, there are multiple ways to fix it. One is to use %dir
entries in the %files list. Another is to include directories
plus their contents recursively.

Comment 3 Martin Nagy 2008-02-25 09:35:12 UTC
Thanks.
Fixed in netatalk-2.0.3-17.fc9