|Summary:||linphone should have a no X package|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Patrice Dumas <pertusus>|
|Component:||linphone||Assignee:||Rakesh Pandit <rpandit>|
|Status:||CLOSED WONTFIX||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2009-07-14 18:18:55 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description Patrice Dumas 2007-03-25 18:34:09 UTC
Description of problem: linphonec (and maybe other text only apps) should be available as a separate package, which wouldn't depend on the X libraries, to have linphonec available even when one don't want to install the X libs. In my opinion the main package should the depend on that package. It could also be nice if it was possible to split out the gnome part such that using GTK linphone is possible without gnome installed (for example in another window manager). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): linphone-1.6.0-4.fc7 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
Comment 1 Patrice Dumas 2007-04-16 21:05:19 UTC
linphone-1.7.1.tar.gz is out. With --with-osip-version and --enable-external-ortp you could drop linphone-1.5.1-osipcompat.patch linphone-1.4.1-libs.patch and avoid rerunning the autotools. Also it should be easier to split a gtk only subpackage. I can make spec file diffs if you like.
Comment 2 Patrice Dumas 2007-11-28 22:31:47 UTC
linphone-2.0.0 is out. What about this no X package with linphonec and sipomatic?
Comment 3 Jeffrey C. Ollie 2007-11-28 23:27:43 UTC
I think that linphone would benefit from being moved to livna/rpmforge so that it can be linked against ffmpeg so that video calls are supported, so I'm not sure that I want to deal much with linphone in Fedora.
Comment 4 Bug Zapper 2008-04-04 06:40:08 UTC
Fedora apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We're sorry it's taken so long for your bug to be properly triaged and acted on. We appreciate the time you took to report this issue and want to make sure no important bugs slip through the cracks. If you're currently running a version of Fedora Core between 1 and 6, please note that Fedora no longer maintains these releases. We strongly encourage you to upgrade to a current Fedora release. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained and closing them. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle/EOL If this bug is still open against Fedora Core 1 through 6, thirty days from now, it will be closed 'WONTFIX'. If you can reporduce this bug in the latest Fedora version, please change to the respective version. If you are unable to do this, please add a comment to this bug requesting the change. Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we are following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. And if you'd like to join the bug triage team to help make things better, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
Comment 5 Bug Zapper 2008-05-06 19:24:51 UTC
This bug is open for a Fedora version that is no longer maintained and will not be fixed by Fedora. Therefore we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen thus bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
Comment 6 Patrice Dumas 2008-05-11 22:23:36 UTC
I haven't checked, but issue certainly still present in rawhide.
Comment 7 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 02:42:06 UTC
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 8 Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 22:31:08 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 9 Bug Zapper 2009-07-14 18:18:55 UTC
Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.