Bug 2339920

Summary: baekmuk-bdf-fonts: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f42
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Fedora Release Engineering <releng>
Component: baekmuk-bdf-fontsAssignee: Peng Wu <pwu>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: fonts-bugs, i18n-bugs, petersen, pwu, tagoh
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-41.fc43 baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-41.fc42 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-02-06 04:40:37 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2260875, 2300528    
Attachments:
Description Flags
build.log
none
root.log
none
state.log none

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2025-01-22 19:09:05 UTC
baekmuk-bdf-fonts failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f42

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=127934747


For details on the mass rebuild see:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_42_Mass_Rebuild
Please fix baekmuk-bdf-fonts at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to
ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks,
baekmuk-bdf-fonts will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 43,
baekmuk-bdf-fonts will be retired, if it still fails to build.

For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/

Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2025-01-22 19:09:08 UTC
Created attachment 2068343 [details]
build.log

Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2025-01-22 19:09:10 UTC
Created attachment 2068344 [details]
root.log

file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes

Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2025-01-22 19:09:11 UTC
Created attachment 2068345 [details]
state.log

Comment 4 Fedora Release Engineering 2025-01-22 20:39:37 UTC
*** Bug 2339529 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Akira TAGOH 2025-01-23 13:29:25 UTC
Well, fonts-rpm-macros relies on fontconfig to generate appstream xml file etc though, BDF fonts isn't supported by fontconfig and is useless on the modern applications. That said this sort of error should be avoided by setting fontappstreams macro to the own xml file. This has been fixed in fonts-rpm-macros 2.0.5-21 in rawhide.

So to fix this, if you think this is still useful, you can write your own appstream xml file and set it as fontappstreams macro in the spec file.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2025-02-06 04:38:00 UTC
FEDORA-2025-1944f602bf (baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-41.fc43) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-1944f602bf

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2025-02-06 04:40:37 UTC
FEDORA-2025-1944f602bf (baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-41.fc43) has been pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2025-02-06 04:47:04 UTC
FEDORA-2025-ad38b9351b (baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-41.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-ad38b9351b

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2025-02-06 04:49:37 UTC
FEDORA-2025-ad38b9351b (baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-41.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.