Bug 23425

Summary: Bugzilla omits the bugzilla report item for bug reports
Product: [Community] Bugzilla Reporter: R P Herrold <herrold>
Component: Bugzilla GeneralAssignee: David Lawrence <dkl>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 2.8Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-04-26 03:51:09 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description R P Herrold 2001-01-05 17:04:10 UTC 
I just queried the Bugzilla dababase, to see if a Bugzilla bug I am about 
report, and confirmed that it was not present.

When I then went to add the bug, Bugzilla itself is not present in the 
"enter_bug.cgi" lookup.

Solution:

Force an add the Bugzilla as a package returned to ALL 'enter_big.cgi'
results for the 'Product' field.

-------------------

It also appears that there are 150 open Bugzila bugs, some YEARS old ...
Comment 1 Michael Fulbright 2001-01-09 21:41:09 UTC 
Assigning to bugzilla maintainer.
Comment 2 David Lawrence 2001-01-11 16:56:19 UTC 
Changing product to Bugzilla
Comment 3 David Lawrence 2001-01-11 16:57:16 UTC 
Did you choose Bugzilla from the list of product categories when first entering
the bug? There isnt a bugzilla component in the Red Hat Linux product choice.
Comment 4 R P Herrold 2001-01-11 17:23:25 UTC 
... This may be a Design RFE instead of a bug, per se.  The dichotomy
between Query (which UNCLUDES Bugzilla), and Enter,, which does not)
'bit' me.  In the interest of obtaining better reports, it may be
proper to merge the Bugzilla Entry into appearances in the BETA and
MAIN entry lines (if indeed not ALL lines) so that reporting is
more seamless.

(As to the question, I am a 'tester' and so the display I see probably )
varies from a general public view -- I'd guess ...)
Comment 5 R P Herrold 2001-03-07 00:28:10 UTC 
I see this still open -- It is really mutated into an RFE, I guess
Comment 6 R P Herrold 2003-04-26 03:51:09 UTC 
stale EOL version -- closing