Bug 2343212

Summary: Review Request: phosh-osk-stub - An alternative OSK for Phosh
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Sam Day <me>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: lihis, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: AutomationTriaged, Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://gitlab.gnome.org/guidog/phosh-osk-stub
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-08-14 18:06:51 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8590209 to 8804538
none
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8804538 to 8812176 none

Description Sam Day 2025-01-31 15:30:12 UTC
Spec URL: https://pagure.io/samcday/phosh-osk-stub/raw/5323809796d910e55699acea5802b128c06ff7a0/f/phosh-osk-stub.spec
SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3521/128683521/phosh-osk-stub-0.44.0-1.fc42.src.rpm
Description: An alternative OSK for Phosh.  It can replace the default OSK squeekboard.
Fedora Account System Username: samcday

Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=128683474

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-01-31 15:40:53 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8590209
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2343212-phosh-osk-stub/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08590209-phosh-osk-stub/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2025-03-22 16:18:14 UTC
Created attachment 2081366 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8590209 to 8804538

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2025-03-22 16:18:16 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8804538
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2343212-phosh-osk-stub/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08804538-phosh-osk-stub/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2025-03-24 11:22:12 UTC
Created attachment 2081635 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8804538 to 8812176

Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2025-03-24 11:22:15 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8812176
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2343212-phosh-osk-stub/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08812176-phosh-osk-stub/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 8 Tomi Lähteenmäki 2025-08-09 13:29:11 UTC
Apparently this has been renamed to Stevia [1]. Do you mind updating this? Or if are not working on this I can take over.

[1] https://social.phosh.mobi/@phosh/statuses/01JZ0RZMKQCGMT3SCQWCEKTHC7

Comment 9 Tomi Lähteenmäki 2025-08-14 17:35:59 UTC
Discussed in Fedora Mobility's Matrix channel with Sam and I'll take over this review request: https://matrix.to/#/!sXLzaXgfXmVJufaSWq:fedoraproject.org/$-sJhV7OX4nckPfHlWsZ9VKl-_f8i8l0PWE9Q-1Z7HTY?via=fedora.im&via=matrix.org&via=kde.org

Comment 10 Tomi Lähteenmäki 2025-08-14 18:06:51 UTC
I'll go ahead and create new ticket instead of reusing this; reverting values back to original and marking this as duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2388645 ***