Bug 2343733

Summary: CVE-2024-47855 picocli: Mishandling of an unbalanced comment string in json-lib [fedora-40]
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Avinash Hanwate <ahanwate>
Component: picocliAssignee: Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 40CC: didiksupriadi41, mizdebsk
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Target Release: ---Flags: mizdebsk: needinfo? (ahanwate)
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: {"flaws": ["bb50cdfa-4b52-4fbc-b880-95aad1a3e425"]}
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-02-26 05:44:05 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2316421    

Description Avinash Hanwate 2025-02-04 13:05:03 UTC
More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316421

Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process.

Comment 1 Mikolaj Izdebski 2025-02-17 09:14:10 UTC
I don't see any relation of picocli to the affected json-lib.
Can you explain why do you think that picocli can be affected by this CVE?

Comment 2 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2025-02-18 14:00:19 UTC
This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.

Comment 3 Mikolaj Izdebski 2025-02-26 05:44:05 UTC
I think this issue does not affect picocli.
If you disagree please reopen this bug and elaborate what is the relation of picocli to the vulneralble json-lib.