Bug 2344120

Summary:	Review Request: rust-gst-plugin-rav1e - GStreamer rav1e AV1 encoder plugin
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Fabio Valentini <decathorpe>
Status:	ASSIGNED ---	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	decathorpe, package-review
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	AutomationTriaged
Target Release:	---	Flags:	decathorpe: fedora-review?
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
URL:	https://crates.io/crates/gst-plugin-rav1e
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Yaakov Selkowitz 2025-02-06 04:54:26 UTC

Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/rust-gst-plugin-rav1e.spec
SRPM URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/rust-gst-plugin-rav1e-0.13.0-1.fc42.src.rpm
Description: GStreamer rav1e AV1 encoder plugin
Fedora Account System Username: yselkowitz

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-02-06 05:06:30 UTC

Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8612367
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2344120-rust-gst-plugin-rav1e/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08612367-rust-gst-plugin-rav1e/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Fabio Valentini 2025-03-15 16:44:35 UTC

Similar questions as on the -ndi plugin:

- The Provides for the actual upstream name is missing compared to existing plugins from gst-plugins-rs, is that intentional?

- You're packaging gstreamer-check, would it make sense to wait until that's available, and then enable tests, or would you rather submit as-is and enable tests later?

Other than that, package LGTM.