Bug 2344124

Summary:	Review Request: rust-gst-plugin-tracers - GStreamer Rust tracers plugin
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Fabio Valentini <decathorpe>
Status:	ASSIGNED ---	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	decathorpe, package-review
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	AutomationTriaged
Target Release:	---	Flags:	decathorpe: fedora-review?
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
URL:	https://crates.io/crates/gst-plugin-tracers
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Yaakov Selkowitz 2025-02-06 05:04:42 UTC

Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/rust-gst-plugin-tracers.spec
SRPM URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/rust-gst-plugin-tracers-0.13.4-1.fc42.src.rpm
Description: GStreamer Rust tracers plugin
Fedora Account System Username: yselkowitz

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-02-06 05:15:05 UTC

Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8612373
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2344124-rust-gst-plugin-tracers/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08612373-rust-gst-plugin-tracers/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Fabio Valentini 2025-03-15 17:48:20 UTC

Version 0.13.4 doesn't contain the LICENSE file for the MPL-2.0 license, which is (if I'm reading the license terms correctly) a requirement. This seems to have been fixed with version 0.13.5, so please update to that.

Additionally, the same questions about 1) whether the Provides for the upstream project name were dropped accidentally and 2) whether you want to package now and enable tests later apply here, too.