Bug 23478
Summary: | inetd/xinetd.conf entries mgmt | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | stano |
Component: | xinetd | Assignee: | Trond Eivind Glomsrxd <teg> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 7.0 | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-01-06 10:17:31 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
stano
2001-01-06 10:17:29 UTC
There isn't a glibc/compilers mess, but binaries compiled on 7 aren't compatible with 6.2 due to use of new glibc (binary compatiblity is what we use to define a major series). 7 is a nice development platform, but if you need to deploy on multiple releases you need to compile with older libraries as the other ones aren't as uptodate yet. Anyway, inetd and xinetd are very different - the way to check for which one is present would be "rpm -q inetd" (or xinetd), and check if it is running with "service xinetd status" (or inetd) |