Bug 2351625 (CVE-2025-21861)

Summary: CVE-2025-21861 kernel: mm/migrate_device: don't add folio to be freed to LRU in migrate_device_finalize()
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: OSIDB Bzimport <bzimport>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Product Security <prodsec-ir-bot>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: unspecifiedCC: dfreiber, drow, jburrell, vkumar
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
A vulnerability was found in the Linux kernel's memory migration system in the migrate_device_finalize() function, where a folio that should be freed is erroneously added back into the Least Recently Used (LRU) list. This issue can lead to memory corruption caused by a use-after-free issue when a previously freed folio is reaccessed, leading to system instability or potential denial of service.
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2025-03-12 12:24:10 UTC 
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/migrate_device: don't add folio to be freed to LRU in migrate_device_finalize()

If migration succeeded, we called
folio_migrate_flags()->mem_cgroup_migrate() to migrate the memcg from the
old to the new folio.  This will set memcg_data of the old folio to 0.

Similarly, if migration failed, memcg_data of the dst folio is left unset.

If we call folio_putback_lru() on such folios (memcg_data == 0), we will
add the folio to be freed to the LRU, making memcg code unhappy.  Running
the hmm selftests:

  # ./hmm-tests
  ...
  #  RUN           hmm.hmm_device_private.migrate ...
  [  102.078007][T14893] page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x7ff27d200 pfn:0x13cc00
  [  102.079974][T14893] anon flags: 0x17ff00000020018(uptodate|dirty|swapbacked|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x7ff)
  [  102.082037][T14893] raw: 017ff00000020018 dead000000000100 dead000000000122 ffff8881353896c9
  [  102.083687][T14893] raw: 00000007ff27d200 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
  [  102.085331][T14893] page dumped because: VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!memcg && !mem_cgroup_disabled())
  [  102.087230][T14893] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [  102.088279][T14893] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 14893 at ./include/linux/memcontrol.h:726 folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x10e/0x170
  [  102.090478][T14893] Modules linked in:
  [  102.091244][T14893] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 14893 Comm: hmm-tests Not tainted 6.13.0-09623-g6c216bc522fd #151
  [  102.093089][T14893] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014
  [  102.094848][T14893] RIP: 0010:folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x10e/0x170
  [  102.096104][T14893] Code: ...
  [  102.099908][T14893] RSP: 0018:ffffc900236c37b0 EFLAGS: 00010293
  [  102.101152][T14893] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffea0004f30000 RCX: ffffffff8183f426
  [  102.102684][T14893] RDX: ffff8881063cb880 RSI: ffffffff81b8117f RDI: ffff8881063cb880
  [  102.104227][T14893] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000000
  [  102.105757][T14893] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: ffffc900236c37d8
  [  102.107296][T14893] R13: ffff888277a2bcb0 R14: 000000000000001f R15: 0000000000000000
  [  102.108830][T14893] FS:  00007ff27dbdd740(0000) GS:ffff888277a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [  102.110643][T14893] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [  102.111924][T14893] CR2: 00007ff27d400000 CR3: 000000010866e000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0
  [  102.113478][T14893] PKRU: 55555554
  [  102.114172][T14893] Call Trace:
  [  102.114805][T14893]  <TASK>
  [  102.115397][T14893]  ? folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x10e/0x170
  [  102.116547][T14893]  ? __warn.cold+0x110/0x210
  [  102.117461][T14893]  ? folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x10e/0x170
  [  102.118667][T14893]  ? report_bug+0x1b9/0x320
  [  102.119571][T14893]  ? handle_bug+0x54/0x90
  [  102.120494][T14893]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x50
  [  102.121433][T14893]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
  [  102.122435][T14893]  ? __wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x76/0xd0
  [  102.123506][T14893]  ? dump_page+0x4f/0x60
  [  102.124352][T14893]  ? folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x10e/0x170
  [  102.125500][T14893]  folio_batch_move_lru+0xd4/0x200
  [  102.126577][T14893]  ? __pfx_lru_add+0x10/0x10
  [  102.127505][T14893]  __folio_batch_add_and_move+0x391/0x720
  [  102.128633][T14893]  ? __pfx_lru_add+0x10/0x10
  [  102.129550][T14893]  folio_putback_lru+0x16/0x80
  [  102.130564][T14893]  migrate_device_finalize+0x9b/0x530
  [  102.131640][T14893]  dmirror_migrate_to_device.constprop.0+0x7c5/0xad0
  [  102.133047][T14893]  dmirror_fops_unlocked_ioctl+0x89b/0xc80

Likely, nothing else goes wrong: putting the last folio reference will
remove the folio from the LRU again.  So besides memcg complaining, adding
the folio to be freed to the LRU is just an unnecessary step.

The new flow resembles what we have in migrate_folio_move(): add the dst
to the lru, rem
---truncated---
Comment 1 Mauro Matteo Cascella 2025-03-12 16:28:06 UTC 
Upstream advisory:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2025031216-CVE-2025-21861-c775@gregkh/T