Bug 2353395 (F42Workstationlivex86_64Oversize)
| Summary: | Fedora 42: Workstation live x86_64 image exceeds maximum size | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Fedora QA Tools SIG <qa-tools-sig> |
| Component: | distribution | Assignee: | Aoife Moloney <amoloney> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 42 | CC: | awilliam, kevin, kparal, ngompa13, robatino |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | AcceptedBlocker | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | --- | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-03-24 11:47:21 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2041649, 2291263, 2291265 | ||
|
Description
Fedora QA Tools SIG
2025-03-19 17:58:39 UTC
Where are your newlines, you silly QA bot? Anyway, this is an automatic blocker per policy. Notified the Workstation WG here: https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/477 The current nightly image is 2.23GB. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2684678 It probably got big temporarily because of the test to decrease the erofs chunk size. I reverted it when it didn't actually help so the size is back down now. Yes, I already noticed, after creating the WG ticket :) -rw-r--r--. 1 qemu qemu 2500216832 Mar 21 10:07 Fedora-Workstation-Live-42-20250319.n.0.x86_64.iso -rw-r--r--. 1 qemu qemu 2396141568 Mar 24 07:54 Fedora-Workstation-Live-42-20250323.n.0.x86_64.iso Thanks. yeah, I was tracking this but saw Neal's commits and assumed they had something to do with it, so I didn't escalate to the WG yet. I had it on my todo list today to check if current images were still oversize. (In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #5) > yeah, I was tracking this but saw Neal's commits and assumed they had > something to do with it, so I didn't escalate to the WG yet. I had it on my > todo list today to check if current images were still oversize. Yeah, I reverted it because I noticed that it blew the images up and it didn't help the original issue at all. |