Bug 2355359
| Summary: | "error registering mlkem512 with no hash" when running "rpm -q " | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dan Horák <dan> |
| Component: | oqsprovider | Assignee: | Dmitry Belyavskiy <dbelyavs> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | crypto-team, dbelyavs, decathorpe, geert, igor.raits, jjelen, mdomonko, mspacek, mturk, packaging-team-maint, pmatilai, rust-sig, shebburn, suraj.ghimire7, tm |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | Flags: | fedora-admin-xmlrpc:
mirror+
|
| Hardware: | s390x | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | --- | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-07-01 09:58:22 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 467765 | ||
|
Description
Dan Horák
2025-03-27 14:36:34 UTC
Might be s390x specific as I haven't seen it on eg. ppc64le It is not an s390 issue but it also is not OpenSSL issue, OpenSSL doesn't have this line or its parts in code. Looks like a rpm issue to me. That's funny because there's also nothing resembling such an error in rpm. My assumption is that something in the Rust side has a closer version dependency on OpenSSL than what is tracked by the soname dependency, and that this can be fixed by just rebuilding rpm-sequoia. But, I don't know why that would be specific to s390x. The error doesn't come from rpm-sequoia directly either, but reassigning there as that's the only part of rpm actually connected to openssl. 👀 This sounds *very* strange ... FWIW I built rpm-sequoia 1.8.0 an hour ago, so it was built against OpenSSL 3.5.0. You could try that one. But I doubt that this has anything to do with ABI, so I don't think this will help. It's possible that the Rust bindings for OpenSSL still need updates for changes in 3.5.0, but that's out of my control. Though I do wonder how openssl 3.5.0 was pushed to rawhide with so many failing gating tests: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-a6413a9197 |