Bug 2357479

Summary: Review Request: libpisp - A helper library for the Raspberry Pi ISP (PiSP)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: code, mzamazal, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: AutomationTriaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://github.com/raspberrypi/libpisp
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 182235, 2357897    

Description Peter Robinson 2025-04-04 12:11:04 UTC
SPEC: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libpisp.spec
SRPM: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libpisp-1.2.0-1.fc42.src.rpm

Description:
A helper library to generate run-time configuration for the Raspberry Pi
ISP (PiSP), consisting of the Frontend and Backend hardware components.

koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=131098324

FAS: pbrobinson

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-04-04 12:26:21 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8860655
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2357479-libpisp/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08860655-libpisp/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Ben Beasley 2025-05-19 13:35:46 UTC
The CC0-1.0 license is allowed for content in Fedora, but not-allowed for code.

The meson wrap file utils/libpisp.wrap is an ini-style configuration file and can be considered content. I think the meson options configuration file meson_options.txt should also be considered content.

On the other hand, meson is a (domain-specific, limited) programming language, so I think all of the meson.build files should be considered code. The versioning script utils/version.py is certainly code. Even though these are all build-system files that do not contribute to the licenses of the binary RPMs, CC0-1.0 code cannot be included in source RPMs, either.

For utils/version.py, you could upload a “filtered” source archive to the lookaside cache with the problematic file removed. For the meson.build files, this is not an option, because you need them to build the libary. The only possibilities would seem to be (1) convincing upstream to relicense the files, or (2) convincing Fedora Legal that a usage exception (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_usage_exceptions) should apply in this case.

Comment 3 Peter Robinson 2025-06-18 09:43:24 UTC
I have filed an issue with upstream, also note utils/version.py like the meson files aren't shipped.