Bug 2359063

Summary: Review Request: perl-String-MkPasswd - Perl module for generating random passwords
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Peter Oliver <mavit>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: mavit, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: AutomationTriaged
Target Release: ---Flags: mavit: fedora-review+
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/String-MkPasswd
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: perl-String-MkPasswd-0.05-2.fc43 Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-06-07 18:40:17 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2025-04-11 11:11:10 UTC
Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-String-MkPasswd/perl-String-MkPasswd.spec
SRPM URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-String-MkPasswd/perl-String-MkPasswd-0.05-1.fc43.src.rpm
Description: This packages provides a perl module to generate random passwords.
Fedora Account System Username: rathann

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-04-11 11:19:05 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8890867
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2359063-perl-string-mkpasswd/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08890867-perl-String-MkPasswd/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Peter Oliver 2025-04-17 12:42:26 UTC
Swap you for a review of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2360686 ?

Comment 3 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2025-05-30 10:50:25 UTC
(In reply to Peter Oliver from comment #2)
> Swap you for a review of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2360686
> ?

First round of review done. Sorry for delay.

Comment 4 Peter Oliver 2025-06-03 14:27:11 UTC
Just one minor issue:

[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners:
     /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/String


Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
     Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners:
     /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/String
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 1533 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Perl:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
[x]: CPAN urls should be non-versioned.

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: perl-String-MkPasswd-0.05-1.fc43.noarch.rpm
          perl-String-MkPasswd-scripts-0.05-1.fc43.noarch.rpm
          perl-String-MkPasswd-0.05-1.fc43.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.6.1
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp_ofslt05')]
checks: 32, packages: 3

perl-String-MkPasswd-scripts.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mkpasswd.pl
 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 11 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s 




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "perl-String-MkPasswd-scripts".
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "perl-String-MkPasswd".
There are no files to process nor additional arguments.
Nothing to do, aborting.
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.7.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 2

 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://cpan.metacpan.org/modules/by-module/String/String-MkPasswd-0.05.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 5310f83460045475071666b5423db2f0aa82d6685c802ec7abe6c2c410639b96
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 5310f83460045475071666b5423db2f0aa82d6685c802ec7abe6c2c410639b96


Requires
--------
perl-String-MkPasswd (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    perl(:VERSION)
    perl(Carp)
    perl(Exporter)
    perl(base)
    perl(constant)
    perl(strict)
    perl-libs

perl-String-MkPasswd-scripts (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/perl
    perl(:VERSION)
    perl(File::Basename)
    perl(Getopt::Long)
    perl(String::MkPasswd)
    perl(Text::Wrap)
    perl(constant)
    perl(strict)
    perl-String-MkPasswd



Provides
--------
perl-String-MkPasswd:
    perl(String::MkPasswd)
    perl-String-MkPasswd

perl-String-MkPasswd-scripts:
    perl-String-MkPasswd-scripts



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name perl-String-MkPasswd --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, Perl
Disabled plugins: Python, Ocaml, R, fonts, SugarActivity, PHP, C/C++, Java, Haskell
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comment 5 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2025-06-06 15:18:29 UTC
(In reply to Peter Oliver from comment #4)
> Just one minor issue:
> 
> [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
>      Note: Directories without known owners:
>      /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/String

Fixed. Thanks for the review!

Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-String-MkPasswd/perl-String-MkPasswd.spec
SRPM URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-String-MkPasswd/perl-String-MkPasswd-0.05-2.fc43.src.rpm

* Fri Jun 06 2025 Dominik Mierzejewski <dominik> - 0.05-2
- own the String directory as well

Comment 6 Peter Oliver 2025-06-06 15:45:52 UTC
Approved!

Comment 7 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2025-06-07 14:09:21 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-String-MkPasswd

Comment 8 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2025-06-07 18:40:17 UTC
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-6b59bbd2bb

Thanks for the review!