Bug 235976
Summary: | VBE drivers don't allow refresh rate changes through xrandr | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | The Source <thesource> | ||||||||||||||
Component: | xorg-x11-server | Assignee: | Adam Jackson <ajax> | ||||||||||||||
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> | ||||||||||||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||||||||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | mcepl, rstrode, triage | ||||||||||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||||||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||||||||||
Whiteboard: | bzcl34nup | ||||||||||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-05-07 01:28:02 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
The Source
2007-04-11 06:55:57 UTC
What's the output of xrandr -q on your system? Here you go: SZ: Pixels Physical Refresh *0 1280 x 1024 ( 382mm x 302mm ) *75 1 1024 x 768 ( 382mm x 302mm ) 75 2 800 x 600 ( 382mm x 302mm ) 75 3 640 x 480 ( 382mm x 302mm ) 75 Current rotation - normal Current reflection - none Rotations possible - normal left inverted right Reflections possible - none Only one refresh rate is shown. This is from my work machine. I'll check my home one later Still waiting for the results on the machine where it's a problem. Here's output for my home PC (monitor is connected via DVI) SZ: Pixels Physical Refresh *0 1280 x 1024 ( 342mm x 270mm ) *50 51 58 59 1 1280 x 960 ( 342mm x 253mm ) 52 2 1280 x 800 ( 342mm x 211mm ) 53 60 61 3 1152 x 864 ( 308mm x 228mm ) 54 68 69 70 4 1024 x 768 ( 273mm x 203mm ) 55 71 72 5 800 x 600 ( 213mm x 158mm ) 56 81 82 83 84 85 6 640 x 480 ( 171mm x 126mm ) 57 90 91 92 7 1280 x 768 ( 342mm x 203mm ) 62 63 64 8 1280 x 720 ( 342mm x 190mm ) 65 66 67 9 960 x 600 ( 256mm x 158mm ) 73 10 960 x 540 ( 256mm x 142mm ) 74 75 11 896 x 672 ( 239mm x 177mm ) 76 12 840 x 525 ( 224mm x 138mm ) 77 78 79 13 832 x 624 ( 222mm x 165mm ) 80 14 800 x 512 ( 213mm x 135mm ) 86 15 720 x 450 ( 192mm x 119mm ) 87 16 640 x 512 ( 171mm x 135mm ) 88 89 17 640 x 400 ( 171mm x 105mm ) 93 94 95 18 640 x 384 ( 171mm x 101mm ) 96 97 98 19 640 x 360 ( 171mm x 95mm ) 99 100 101 20 640 x 350 ( 171mm x 92mm ) 102 21 576 x 432 ( 154mm x 114mm ) 103 104 105 106 22 512 x 384 ( 136mm x 101mm ) 107 108 109 23 416 x 312 ( 111mm x 82mm ) 110 24 400 x 300 ( 106mm x 79mm ) 111 112 113 114 25 320 x 240 ( 85mm x 63mm ) 115 116 117 Current rotation - normal Current reflection - none Rotations possible - normal Reflections possible - none Rafresh rates are bogus It's a problem with xrandr itself, not with the gnome-display-properties. Do you use the nv driver, or the binary proprietary driver? On work machine I use driver for intel motherboard video. On home PC I use nvidia module version 97.55 (downloaded from www.nvidia.com) OK, could we split this into two bugs, please, one for each system? Thanks. Note also, that we don't support drivers from nvidia.com, i.e., if you want us to work on this problem, you have to reproduce it with open source nv driver. So, please, file a new bug for one of these two systems, and try to reproduce the problem with open source driver on your home machine. Also, could you please attach to BOTH bugs uncompressed separate attachments of /var/log/Xorg.*.log and /etc/X11/xorg.conf? Thanks a lot, Matej Cepl Attaching home files. Looks like it was incompatibility with nvidia after all. Created attachment 152514 [details]
xrandr output on nv module
Created attachment 152515 [details]
xorg.conf for nv module
Created attachment 152516 [details]
Xorg log file for nv
As for my work machine - please wait until Monday Thanks for the logs, but I have hard time to understand what exactly does it mean? Do you want to say that nv driver displays the values correctly, i.e., that there is no bug there? Of course, nv driver doesn't support all the capabilities of nVidia chips, but is it broken? Is there any bug here at all? No. There is no bug with nv driver. I contacted nvidia and they said that improper xrandr behavior with their driver is expected. This problem is connected to TwinView capabilities. But there is definitely a bug with intel video driver. I'll attach logs and configs from my work PC tomorrow. OK, so looking forward to your logs. Created attachment 152780 [details]
xrandr output for work PC
Created attachment 152781 [details]
xorg.conf for work PC
Created attachment 152782 [details]
xorg log for work PC
Here you go This is actually expected. The i810 driver only picks one refresh rate per size, due to VBE being so utterly broken. It's not _good_, certainly, but it's expected. In F7 and later the intel driver will probably give you what you want. Updating summary to reflect what this bug is actually about. Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. This bug has been in NEEDINFO for more than 30 days since feedback was first requested. As a result we are closing it. If you can reproduce this bug in the future against a maintained Fedora version please feel free to reopen it against that version. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp |