Bug 2361003

Summary: Review Request: rust-errno-sys - Raw FFI bindings to errno location
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: solomoncyj
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: decathorpe, package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://crates.io/crates/errno-sys
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-04-24 11:22:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-04-18 16:12:20 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8920152
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2361003-rust-errno-sys/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08920152-rust-errno-sys/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Fabio Valentini 2025-04-24 10:39:38 UTC
Is there a reason why you need this crate instead of the more widely used one (https://crates.io/crates/errno) ?

Comment 3 solomoncyj 2025-04-24 11:22:32 UTC
upstream removing in the future. closing