Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||pam_krb5 is not linked against libpam|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Jeffrey C. Ollie <jeff>|
|Component:||pam_krb5||Assignee:||Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:||Brian Brock <bbrock>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2008-04-03 22:17:30 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Jeffrey C. Ollie 2007-04-13 15:48:29 EDT
Description of problem: pam_krb5.so is not linked against libpam so it gets this error when you try and use it: Apr 13 14:26:46 anim01 beam: PAM unable to dlopen(/lib/security/pam_krb5.so) Apr 13 14:26:46 anim01 beam: PAM [error: /lib/security/pam_krb5.so: undefined symbol: pam_getenv] Apr 13 14:26:46 anim01 beam: PAM adding faulty module: /lib/security/pam_krb5.so Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pam_krb5-2.2.11-1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Configure pam_krb5 Actual results: Authentication fails Expected results: Authentication succeeds Additional info: Patch attached.
Comment 1 Jeffrey C. Ollie 2007-04-13 15:48:29 EDT
Created attachment 152579 [details] Link pam_krb5.so against libpam
Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-04-03 20:04:59 EDT
Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again.